<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introduction to Podcasting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allever.com/technology/2005/08/09/introduction-to-podcasting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allever.com/technology/2005/08/09/introduction-to-podcasting/</link>
	<description>news, entertainment, technology, and all that ever gets my attention</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pavlos</title>
		<link>http://www.allever.com/technology/2005/08/09/introduction-to-podcasting/#comment-6027</link>
		<dc:creator>Pavlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allever.com/technology/2005/08/09/introduction-to-podcasting/#comment-6027</guid>
		<description>Charles, I appreciate you pointing this out, since I would hate there to be any confusion over the use of the term "copyleft". What I mean by it there is a more liberal license than traditional copyright, such as one by the Creative Commons. Not all CC licenses are copyleft in the strict sense of the word.

On another note, by no means should it be perceived that material described as "copyleft" is in the public domain, unless it is specified as such. 

Perhaps the license you mention is one of the more liberal licenses via Creative Commons, and people can visit &lt;a href="http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses" title="Creative Commons Licenses" rel="nofollow"&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt; to discover more about Creative Commons licensing. 

For more information on the term "copyleft", Wikipedia has &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyleft" title="Copyleft - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" rel="nofollow"&gt;this entry&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles, I appreciate you pointing this out, since I would hate there to be any confusion over the use of the term &#8220;copyleft&#8221;. What I mean by it there is a more liberal license than traditional copyright, such as one by the Creative Commons. Not all CC licenses are copyleft in the strict sense of the word.</p>
<p>On another note, by no means should it be perceived that material described as &#8220;copyleft&#8221; is in the public domain, unless it is specified as such. </p>
<p>Perhaps the license you mention is one of the more liberal licenses via Creative Commons, and people can visit <a href="http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses" title="Creative Commons Licenses" rel="nofollow" class="liexternal">this page</a> to discover more about Creative Commons licensing. </p>
<p>For more information on the term &#8220;copyleft&#8221;, Wikipedia has <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyleft" title="Copyleft - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" rel="nofollow" class="liwikipedia">this entry</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Iliya Krempeaux</title>
		<link>http://www.allever.com/technology/2005/08/09/introduction-to-podcasting/#comment-5962</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Iliya Krempeaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 05:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allever.com/technology/2005/08/09/introduction-to-podcasting/#comment-5962</guid>
		<description>Pavlos said...

"However, you can play copylefted music, such as music licensed under a creative commons license!"

Now all the Creative Commons licenses are copyleft.

In fact AFAIK out of all the 18 Creative Commons licenses, only 1 of them is copyleft.  (The CC-BY-SA one.)  That's it.


-- Charles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pavlos said&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;However, you can play copylefted music, such as music licensed under a creative commons license!&#8221;</p>
<p>Now all the Creative Commons licenses are copyleft.</p>
<p>In fact AFAIK out of all the 18 Creative Commons licenses, only 1 of them is copyleft.  (The CC-BY-SA one.)  That&#8217;s it.</p>
<p>&#8211; Charles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pavlos</title>
		<link>http://www.allever.com/technology/2005/08/09/introduction-to-podcasting/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Pavlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 01:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allever.com/technology/2005/08/09/introduction-to-podcasting/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Actually, no! It is perfectly legal! Unless you play music in your Podcast, for which you haven't payed the proper license for at RIAA.. However, you can play copylefted music, such as music licensed under a creative commons license! Check that out at: http://creativecommons.org/

Also, try Brad Templeton's "brief intro to copyright" at: http://www.templetons.com/brad/copyright.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, no! It is perfectly legal! Unless you play music in your Podcast, for which you haven&#8217;t payed the proper license for at RIAA.. However, you can play copylefted music, such as music licensed under a creative commons license! Check that out at: <a href="http://creativecommons.org/" rel="nofollow" class="liexternal">http://creativecommons.org/</a></p>
<p>Also, try Brad Templeton&#8217;s &#8220;brief intro to copyright&#8221; at: <a href="http://www.templetons.com/brad/copyright.html" rel="nofollow" class="liexternal">http://www.templetons.com/brad/copyright.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bluerose</title>
		<link>http://www.allever.com/technology/2005/08/09/introduction-to-podcasting/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Bluerose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 19:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allever.com/technology/2005/08/09/introduction-to-podcasting/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>isn't that illegal?  It sounds like it must infringe some type of copyright...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isn&#8217;t that illegal?  It sounds like it must infringe some type of copyright&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
